Research on the predictive value of academic and other initial teacher education (ITE) selection criteria – such as essay writing, interviews, reference letters, psychometric tests and standardised test results – on teacher quality is relatively scarce and shows mixed results (Byrnes, Kiger and Shechtman, 2003; Jacobowitz, 1994). In effect, an ITE programme may not be highly selective, but may still do an excellent job in preparing teacher candidates (Feuer et al., 2013). For example, the introduction of certification mechanisms, degrees earned or years or substantive features such as opportunities for grounded practices are important for teacher candidates (Darling-Hammond, 2017; Jenset, Klette and Hammerness, 2017).
The strategy of providing more quality filters, rather than rely only on academic results, for the selection into initial teacher education (ITE), has been pursued by a number of countries undergoing reform of initial teacher preparation (ITP), including the Netherlands. The goal of implementing quality filters explicitly addresses the narrowness and unintended results that accompany the use of academic criteria as the principal selection criteria into ITE, which has been challenged by policy makers (OECD, 2014). One of the main reasons is that the raise of the requirements for entering into ITP systems does not automatically change the social status of the teaching profession. Capable young students that can choose to go into high status occupation are not likely to go into ITP as long as teaching is socially perceived as easy to get into, while young people that might have been highly motivated to pursue a teacher career can become discouraged to enter the profession. As a result, there is a risk to attract people who could not get into more demanding professions, but who are not the one with the best qualifications or the highest motivated (OECD, 2011, p. 236).
With regard to the implementation of quality filters to improve the recruitment of primary teachers, the Netherlands has been pursuing measures to:
Measures to filter out potential recruits lacking the subject knowledge and, in particular, literacy and numeracy skills, to make strong teachers
In 2016, a National Expert Group was formed to develop practices to improve the selection of recruits to primary education. Currently, all recruits to primary ITE must meet knowledge-level criteria in history, geography, nature and science. At the end of the first year of primary ITE, all students must pass literacy and numeracy tests. Interviewees reported to the OECD review team that these tests have both improved the quality of recruits to programmes and also reduced drop-out from history, geography and nature and science programmes: one HBO (Universities of Applied Sciences) reported that the drop-out rate was reduced from 50% to 25%. According to those interviewed, the introduction of testing has had a particular impact on students from senior secondary vocational education (MBO), many of whom are from low socio-economic backgrounds. The HBOs are looking at ways to provide support to those trainees with the potential to make strong primary teachers so that they achieve the required standards.
Measures to attract higher qualified recruits to primary education by offering more lateral routes to teaching
In the Netherlands, universities have played only a small role in training primary teachers, and there have been few options for university graduates, compared to HBOs, to enter primary teaching. Further, although ITE programmes have been traditionally provided by HBOs, a growing proportion of teacher candidates have been accessing ITE through senior secondary education (HAVO) or middle management training (MBO4 diploma). Currently, out of the 15% of the students in the academic/scientific high school track (VWO), only a few opt to study primary ITE at an HBO (Error! Reference source not found.).
More generally, the Ministry of education has implemented alternative pathways to incentivise and attract more and more diverse groups of teacher candidates (Cedefop, 2016). For example, there are lateral-entry places offered in which the teacher candidates is assessed to determine if we can start teaching right away, while receiving part-time training. Other measures include:
Special pathways encouraging second career teachers, such as aptitude test based certifications or non-government funded ITP programmes tailored for second career teachers.
The OECD review team in its review of the Netherlands on 6‑10 March 2017 noted that this practice:
The OECD review team noted:
Brouwer, P. et al. (2016), Country Background Report, OECD Initial Teacher Preparation Study. The Netherlands, ecbo, The Hague. 
Byrnes, D., G. Kiger and Z. Shechtman (2003), “Evaluating the use of group interviews to select students into teacher-education programs”, Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 54/2, pp. 163-172, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487102250310. 
Cedefop (2016), Vocational education and training in the Netherlands. Short description, Cedefop information series, Luxemburg, http://dx.doi.org/10.2801/476727. 
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017), “Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice?”, European Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 40/3, pp. 291-309, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399. 
Feuer, M. et al. (2013), Evaluation of Teacher Preparation Programs: Purposes, Methods, and Policy Options, National Academy of Education, Washington, D.C. 
Jenset, I., K. Klette and K. Hammerness (2017), “Attention to Practice in Teacher Education: Growing Internationally”, Journal of Teacher Education, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487117728248. 
OECD (2014), Education at a Glance 2014: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/19991487. 
OECD (2011), Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education, Lessons from PISA for the United States, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264096660-en. 
This case study describes a “promising practice” drawn from an OECD review of initial teacher preparation in the Netherlands from 6-10 March 2017.
The OECD Review Team – Hannah von Ahlefeld (OECD), Michael Day (University of Roehampton), Kjetil Helgeland (OECD) and Danielle Toon (Learning First) – identified a number of “Promising practices” in each country. These practices may not be widespread or representative, but seen in the context of other challenges, they represent a strength or opportunity to improve the country’s initial teacher preparation system – and for other countries to learn from them.
This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries.
This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.
You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgement of OECD as source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to firstname.lastname@example.org.