The Ministry of Education and Research established “Centres of Excellence in Higher Education” (SFU) in 2010 as a prestige arrangement for educational activities in higher education. The overarching goal of the SFU scheme is to contribute to the development of excellent quality in higher education, and to highlight the fact that education and research are equally important activities for higher education institutions. The SFU scheme, managed by the Norwegian Agency for Quality Assurance in Education (NOKUT), implies a “focused and long-term commitment to stimulate the development of teaching and learning methods at the bachelor and master’s level” (Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research, 2016, p. 39).
Since the launching of the pilot phase in 2010, four centres of excellence have been selected, including ProTed, the Centre for Professional Learning in Teacher Education. This centre, the result of a collaboration between the University of Oslo and the University of Tromsø, wasestablished in 2012 to enhance quality in teacher education through developing integration and coherence via systematic experiments and disseminating results, and thus with the mandate of improving the quality in ITE.
One of the main challenges to improve the delivery of ITE into more research-based institutions is to go beyond “stand-alone efforts” and transform current complex epistemic structures within ITE programmes and organisations, rather than revisiting curricula and policy documents (Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research, 2016). ProTed aimed at integrating scientific subjects, school subjects, pedagogy, and subject didactics, and thus create integrated teacher programmes (Vestøl, 2016). ProTed is organised in work packages, each contributing to the design of coherent teacher education practices – Figure 1.
The first three work packages (Figure 1) are designed to highlight innovation in teacher education programmes related to student centred study designs. A large body of development projects collectively generates a movement towards the future, experimenting with new design elements throughout the five-year course of the study programmes (ProTed, 2017)A good example of an innovative ProTed project is its strategic alliance with the National Knowledge Centre for Education and the establishment of an annual “Knowledge Parliament”. This is an annual meeting for teacher educators to explore issues such as developing research-based initial teacher education, joint development of the knowledge and practice field by researchers and practitioners as the start of a sustained, collaborative approach to developing quality.
This strand is developed in a dedicated work package called “Teaching subjects”, aiming at investigating ways of teaching, disseminating and researching within subjects disciplines (Vestøl, 2016). For example, Vestøl and Lund (2017), describe how ProTed integrates theory, practice and research in two cases. First, using digital exams where students are requested to apply knowledge from pedagogy, subject disciplines and practices in their analysis of a classroom situation presented in a video. As discussed by these authors, this case shows the diverse ways in which knowledge integration takes place and the multiple strategies teacher candidates need to develop to deal with holistic interpretations of these classrooms. The second case is the “Introduction to R&D” project, where students are introduced to the use of research procedures. In this project, students focus on classroom observation and interviews of their teacher educators, followed by a two-week intensive work analysis.
ProTed also has an important and strategic role in leading the group of teacher educators doing revisions to the ITE programme guidelines for slimming down the content and increasing coherence and links with practice. A strong example is the development of strategic partnerships between teacher education institutions (TEIs) and schools as centres of excellence (Lund and Eriksen, 2016). The ProTed University Schools concept has been adopted by a number of TEIs. They create an arena in which TEIs and schools can enter into joint research projects and engage together in reading and evaluating research and planning small scale enquiries focussed on improving everyone’s practice. As discussed by Lund and Eriksen (2016), the work conducted by ProTed makes gradual contributions to teacher education programmes that develop professional teachers who are prepared to teach in rapidly changing knowledge societies.
Hunt (2014)argues that teacher education programmes cannot continue as isolated institutions and new relationships with schools are needed to connect theory to practice. Underpinning the importance of these partnerships is the triad-model developed by Lillejord and Børte (2016)among mentors, supervisors and students to improve teacher candidates learning. In order to become professional education, TEIs need to partner schools to develop a common understanding on principles and practices, which in turn requires competent and engaged leadership.
Sharing of best practice
As showed in Figure 1, work packages four and five are concerned with the dissemination and implementation of new practices and research on teacher education. Work package four is concerned with building learning communities of teacher educators locally, nationally and internationally, aiming at integrating research- and experience-based knowledge on teacher education. To this extent, ProTed has increased efforts in two areas: developing research and development competences among staff, and is currently developing a model to improve the training of teacher educators (ProTed, 2017). Further, work package five synthesises the knowledge produced through the other work packages, evaluates this knowledge in light of national and international research, and develops models for study design and quality descriptions. In 2018, two new projects aim at conducting an overall analysis of the “Oslo model for teacher education”. One is the post-doctoral project “Using video as an instructional tool to strengthen teacher candidates’ knowledge base and professional identity” – a longitudinal study, and a review on all research and evaluation of the entire teacher education programme at the University of Oslo.
The OECD review team in its visit to Norway on 24‑28 April 2017 considered that ProTed:
The OECD review team noted that:
Fazekas, M. and I. Litjens (2014), A Skills beyond School Review of the Netherlands, OECD Reviews of Vocational Education and Training, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264221840-en. 
Hunt, C. (2014), “A Review of School-University Partnerships for Successful New Teacher Induction”, School-University Partnerships, Vol. 7/1, pp. 35-48. 
Lillejord, S. and K. Børte (2016), “Partnership in teacher education-a research mapping Partnership in teacher education-a research mapping”, European Journal of Teacher Education, Vol. 39/5, pp. 550-563, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1252911. 
Lund, A. and T. Eriksen (2016), “Teacher Education as Transformation: Some Lessons Learned from a Center for Excellence in Education”, Acta Didactica Norge, Vol. 10/2, p. 53, http://dx.doi.org/10.5617/adno.2483. 
Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research (2016), OECD TALIS initial teacher preparation preparation study. Country Background Report Norway. 
Onderwijsraad((n.d.)), Well Trained Teachers for Secondary Vocational Education, https:/www.onderwijsraad.nl/English/publications/2011/well-trained-teachers-for-secondary-vocational-education/item1136#) (accessed on 07 February 2018). 
ProTed (2017), Centre for Professional Learning in Teacher Education. Annual Report, https://www.nokut.no/siteassets/sfu/arsrapporter/annual-report-for-proted_2017.pdf (accessed on 13 November 2018). 
Vestøl, J. (2016), “Design, Integration, and Quality. Teacher Education from the Perspective of ProTed, a Norwegian Centre of Excellence in Education”, Acta Didactica Norge, Vol. 10/2, pp. 73-91, https://www.journals.uio.no/index.php/adno/article/viewFile/2394/2459 (accessed on 13 November 2018). 
Vestol, J. and A. Lund (2017), “Co-configuring Design Elements and Quality Aspects in Teacher Education: A Research Agenda”, in Peters, M., B. Cowie and I. Menter (eds.), A Companion to Research in Teacher Education, Springer, Singapore. 
Visser, K. (2010), The Netherlands. VET in Europe – Country Report 2010, Centre for Expertise in Vocational Education and Training (ecbo), http://file:///C:/Users/VonAhlefeld_H/Downloads/2010_cr_nl.pdf. 
This case study describes a “promising practice” drawn from an OECD review of initial teacher preparation in the United States from 25-28 October 2016.
The OECD Review Team identified a number of “promising practices” in each country. These practices may not be widespread or representative, but seen in the context of other challenges, they represent a strength or opportunity to improve the country’s initial teacher preparation system – and for other countries to learn from them.
This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries.
This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.
You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgement of OECD as source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to firstname.lastname@example.org.